http://www.formfollowsbehavior.com/2006/12/09/from-deconstruction-to-narrative/ informal reflections Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:39:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.formfollowsbehavior.com/2006/12/09/from-deconstruction-to-narrative/#comment-17 anything Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:07:23 +0000 http://www.formfollowsbehavior.com/2006/12/09/from-deconstruction-to-narrative/#comment-17 Thanks Richard. I agree with your assessment! And, I wasn't really familiar with Hejduk, his work and teaching until your comment. Thanks for the reference. Thanks Richard. I agree with your assessment! And, I wasn’t really familiar with Hejduk, his work and teaching until your comment. Thanks for the reference.

]]> http://www.formfollowsbehavior.com/2006/12/09/from-deconstruction-to-narrative/#comment-12 Richard Taransky Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:13:55 +0000 http://www.formfollowsbehavior.com/2006/12/09/from-deconstruction-to-narrative/#comment-12 Enjoyed reading this. Maybe you were never an orthodox Decon. Most of the Decons in the MOMA show didn't have set philoshopical underpinnings like the literary crowd. Your original leanings seem structuralist concerning your interest in the elemental. A primitive language narrating through junctaposition, overlay, and erasure. Hejduk taught this in the 70's at Cooper. I have been interested in this construct "as figural" ever since. Great post... I look forward to hearing more from you. Enjoyed reading this. Maybe you were never an orthodox Decon. Most of the Decons in the MOMA show didn’t have set philoshopical underpinnings like the literary crowd. Your original leanings seem structuralist concerning your interest in the elemental. A primitive language narrating through junctaposition, overlay, and erasure. Hejduk taught this in the 70’s at Cooper. I have been interested in this construct “as figural” ever since. Great post… I look forward to hearing more from you.

]]>